In 09, I was diagnosed with ER+ node neg BC. Had C/T, rads, AI, and currently NED for the ER+ cancer. In April during a regular MRI, a lymph node lit up in my arm pit. It's TNBC. A case review at Moffitt Cancer Center found the cancer in 09 was misdiadnosed by the pathologist. It was an ER core with a TNBC shell. If I had A/C/T in 09, we might not be here but my oncologist wanted to save me the potential for heart issues since I am an athlete.
Fast forward 4.5 years and I feel like he is again being too conservative, reccommending 4 rounds A/C (just finished) then abraxane. I have been reading the ISPY study and feel carbo/taxol and potentially also avastin are called for. The consulting oncologist at Moffitt agrees with me. I am not sold on avastin but am sold on the carbo.
I am no shrinking violet. I know how to handle my oncologist but the issue is: what is the right choice? Do I try for a third opinion to break the stalemate? What If I push hard and choose wrong? I am made of steel but I assure you, I cannot do this a third time. Help