New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - shortened radiation
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

shortened radiation

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
alaura View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: Jan 04 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote alaura Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: shortened radiation
    Posted: Jan 15 2009 at 5:57pm
I have been researching shortened radiation that uses a little higher doses but shortens the time from 30 TX to about 16-20. Does anyone have any info on this?
Alaura Keith



Edited by alaura - Jan 15 2009 at 5:58pm
Back to Top
Nancy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 23 2007
Location: Altoona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 3814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nancy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 15 2009 at 6:04pm
Alaura,
 Not sure if this is what you are referring to? I think some of the gals have had this.
 
Nancy
 
 


Edited by Nancy - Jan 15 2009 at 6:04pm
Nancy
DD Lori dx TNBC June 13,2007
Lumpectomy due to incorrect dx of a cyst
mastectomy July 6 2007
chemo ACT all 3 every 3 weeks 6 tx Aug-Nov
28 rads ended Jan 2008
Back to Top
alaura View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: Jan 04 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote alaura Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 15 2009 at 6:18pm
Nancy, you are such a wealth of knowledge for us newbies. Thank you so much.

Edited by alaura - Jan 15 2009 at 6:19pm
Alaura Keith age 37
dX TNBC Stage 3 July, 08
Neoadjuvant Carbo/Taxol, 13 tx
10 cm lumpectomy, no nodes
17 more Tx started 1/09-05/09
Ellence/Cytoxan
Radiation coming Summer

Back to Top
Nancy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 23 2007
Location: Altoona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 3814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nancy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 15 2009 at 6:28pm
 Computing Alaura,
 
No sweetie....it is Google....what did we do without the internet? You are quite welcome.
Hugs,
Nancy
 
 
 






Nancy
DD Lori dx TNBC June 13,2007
Lumpectomy due to incorrect dx of a cyst
mastectomy July 6 2007
chemo ACT all 3 every 3 weeks 6 tx Aug-Nov
28 rads ended Jan 2008
Back to Top
cduvall1 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jun 04 2008
Location: Blythe, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 148
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cduvall1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 19 2009 at 5:06pm
I saw my radiation/onc last Thursday.  She informed me that I would be getting 25 tx over a 5 week period.  The treatments would start out mild and increase in intensity as the weeks progressed.  When asked if I would be getting IMRT (intensified modulated radiation therapy) she said my insurance would not pay for it but that it would pay for 3D conformal radiation.  However, if I qualified for Medicare I could have IMRT which is apparently slightly more effective than the 3D.  I don't know what "slightly" means.  I have tried to learn more about the different types of radiation and am of the opinion that IMRT is safer for adjoining organs such as lungs and heart.  Wish I knew more.  I'm calling Anthem Blue Cross tomorrow to see what they say...that is if I can get through to someone who has the knowledge to give me an answer.  I really wish I felt better about all of this.   
Carol
dx 3/08 age 63, invasive metaplastic carcinoma, 2cm, node neg, grade 3, stage I, lumpectomy 5/08,AC 4x, Taxol 12x weekly, radiation 5wk, NED 4/29/09
Back to Top
ReneeST View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: Jul 18 2008
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ReneeST Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 25 2009 at 3:23pm
Hi Alaura!
 
I believe we are neighbors!  I live in Auburn, WA . . . did The Reporter do an article on you?
 
I am having 3-week radiation, aka Canadian Study.  Actually, I am having 16 treatments.  Tomorrow will be #11.  Whoo hoo!!!  The Virginia Mason doctor is the one who mentioned it to me when we met last July.  I did some research - looks like Nancy has found some info for you - and felt very comfortable starting this tx.
 
I'm not sure what the Rad Onc calls it, but instead of 200, I'm getting 265.  I do need to get a copy of his recommendation for my files.
 
I just sent you a PM.  Please feel free to give me a call.  We can meet up if you'd like.
 
Take care,
 
Renee
 
 
56 yo Seattle, WA Stage 1, Grade 3, 1.3 cm IDC Lumpectomy Aug 2008
SNB neg;4 rds Taxotere & Cytox. BRCA-2 Variant. 16 Rads Jan 2009 "Canadian Study"
www.reneesbumpintheroad.blogspot.com
Back to Top
hberntsen View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: Jan 10 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hberntsen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 25 2009 at 3:49pm
I had an oncologist in Denver mention  a 4 week course of radiation (instead of 6).  I am seeing the rad onc in Denver on Feb 3 to get the final word.  The onc in Denver was referring to the meta-analysis in Lancet--Canadian study--showing benefit of radiation with 1-3 + nodes.  I would like to pin down exactly what the benefit is before I sign up for rad with one node positive.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
dx 11/08; stage IIa; BRCA1 +; bilteral mastectomy 11/08; just finished 3/6 rounds of TAC + zometa.
Back to Top
mainsailset View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2008
Location: Washington State
Status: Offline
Points: 5004
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mainsailset Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 28 2009 at 7:09am
Wow, I was just thinking about this, good information to read. I had been wondering also about the timing of things. I finish chemo up mid March and they have loosely said I should wait for surgery for 3-6 weeks. Initially I was thinking 6 weeks would be appropriate, then I started thinking that if the surgery came quickly it would have a better chance to grab the tumor before it started to regrow.
Simultaneously, I was at first told to wait 2 weeks from surgery to start the radiation, but now I'm wondering if it's a good thing to shorten that up. The higher strength radiation seems appealing, just curious about the side effects
 
Back to Top
Tracy View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: Jul 20 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tracy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jan 29 2009 at 10:58am
I'm not sure about shortned radiation other than the recent press. I do know about an inhanced radiation available/approved by insurance companies for those whose have denser breats and/or the tumor is on the ride-side (the heart size). I had this form of radiation; lesser side affects in terms of being easier on the skin. Check with your radiologist. Warm wishes, Tracy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.