New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Residual disease following neoadjuvant chemo
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Residual disease following neoadjuvant chemo

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>
Author
MsBliss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Apr 25 2009
Location: Lost Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MsBliss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 25 2011 at 6:25pm
Christina, please give serious attention to what Donna and Mainy said re Vitamin D. 

I have said it before and I will say it again:  Any oncologist who ignores low vitamin D levels in his/her patients is massively uninformed.  IMO, it is a form of malpractice.
Back to Top
DianeEE View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Nov 29 2010
Location: Richland, MI
Status: Offline
Points: 105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DianeEE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 25 2011 at 8:44pm
Hi Everyone,
I have to say that reading the posts about residual disease has made me more than a little worried.  I was diagnosed in November 2010.  The MRI said that the tumor was 3.2 cm with a small "feeder" tumor off of the main tumor.  I did neoadj. chemo. (ACT) for 6 total treatments which ended April 22.  I had a bilateral mastectomy and a preventative oopherectomy in May (I am BRCA2 positive).  The tumor measured 5.1 cm when they removed it.  I had 2 positive lymph nodes out of 14 taken.  I had clean margins but the chest wall margin was only 1 mm.  I had a small portion of my pec. muscle removed to get the clear margin in that area.  My oncologist said that there wasn't any more chemo. that she could give me at that time.  I have now moved on to radiation and have finished 22 treatments out of 36. They are hitting the chest wall, clavical lymph nodes and underarm area extra hard.
 
But, now that I read the earlier posts, I wonder if we should have done another type of chemo. drug.  I was really surprised by the fact that the MRI said it was 3.2 cm initially and it ended up being 5.1 cm when it was actually removed, especially since I went through all of that chemo.   The surgeon said that, perhaps the MRI did not measure it correctly as we both felt that the tumor felt smaller than it did when I was first diagnosed.
 
I am tentatively planning on starting the Metformin trial after radiation.  But, now I wonder if I should also consider the PARP trial that was mentioned earlier.  I hate to start another round of chemo.  But, I'd rather kick this now than have it spread.
 
Any thoughts on my situation?  The surgeon & onc. said that as long as I had clear margins and go through the 36 rounds of radiation, that should do it.  If you have clear margins but a larger than expected tumor, is it still considered residual disease?
DX 11/2010 age 43,BRCA2+,6 rounds TAC,bx mast/ovary removal 5/2011,TNBC tumor 5.1 cm,02/14 nodes positive,37 rads,Cisplatin&PARP trial.Recurrence 2/2012,TN IBC,Abraxane didn't work, Ixempra & Xeloda
Back to Top
mainsailset View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2008
Location: Washington State
Status: Offline
Points: 5004
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mainsailset Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 25 2011 at 10:30pm
Diane, I had several MRI's CAT's during and after chemo, as well as ultrasounds, and I noticed different conclusions on almost all of them...some of the conclusions were simply inaccurate and the onc and I had to revisit them. So there is that aspect of what could be going on with your results.
 
But your comment that your tumor grew during chemo and your onc said that there wasn't any more chemo that she could give you after your surgery has me scratching my head. I had a bit of a dustup with my onc before surgery as he wanted me to leave my port in so that we could have the option of continuing chemo.
 
After I finished radiation we did another CAT scan and blood tumor workup to give me a good idea where I stood. Also, as Denise has commented, the lymph nodes tell a story that will guide you on your decision making...if they were clean or not.
 
What we all see here on an all too regular basis is a medical person or even ourselves that under estimates the tenacity of TNBC. In other words, you may be onto something with your attitude of better safe and sorry...2nd opinons are a good thing believe me.
dx 7/08 TN 14x6.5x5.5 cm tumor

3 Lymph nodes involved, Taxol/Sunitab+AC, 5/09 dbl masectomy, path 2mm tumor removed, lymphs all clear, RAD 32 finished 9/11/09. 9/28 CT clear 10/18/10 CT clear
Back to Top
123Donna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 24 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Status: Offline
Points: 13510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 123Donna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 25 2011 at 11:50pm
Diane,

I agree with Mainy.  I'd get a second or even a 3rd opinion about getting more chemo after you're done with radiation.  You're still at a point where you can ask these questions and get additional treatment if necessary.  I'd consider the size of the tumor and 2 positive nodes as a reason to consider additional treatment.  As we've learned TNBC can be a tricky beast and doesn't play by the rules. 

Donna
DX IDC TNBC 6/09 age 49, Stage 1,Grade 3, 1.5cm,0/5Nodes,KI-67 48%,BRCA-,6/09bi-mx, recon, T/C X4(9/09)
11/10 Recur IM node, Gem,Carb,Iniparib 12/10,MRI NED 2/11,IMRT Radsx40,CT NED11/13,MRI NED3/15

Back to Top
christina1961 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Feb 08 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote christina1961 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 26 2011 at 1:47am
Diane,
I'm sorry you are going through this dilemma also.  It is my understanding that residual disease is remaining tumor and/or lymph nodes positive for cancer following the neoadjuvant chemotherapy - pre-surgery.
 
I feel better that I am getting a second opinion - of course once I'm told that second opinion I'll have another hurdle, but for now I feel a bit more peaceful about it all.  My advice is if you want to get a second opinion, act fast - because I called last Friday and the first available appt I could get was Aug 16. 
 
Wishing you all the best.
2.5 cm TNBC, BRCA-, diag. 2/11, neoadj chemotherapy, uni MX, y2cm,2/16 nodes, RCBII, tumor retested 5-10%ER+,PR-,Her2-, rads, clin trial eribulin 10/11-2/12, tamox.
Back to Top
tania View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 16 2011
Location: sf bay area
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tania Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 26 2011 at 2:36am
Diane - I completely agree with Mainy that I don't understand an oncologist saying there was nothing else chemo could offer after seeing tumor growth on ACT.  I too would urge additional opinions about adjuvant chemo. 
DX 10/2010. 1.5cm, no nodes, grade 2. BRCA1+
Neoadjuvant chemo gem/carb/parpi trial.
Bilateral mastectomy 4/2011
Adjuvant chemo 4X TC - 5/11 - 7/11
Back to Top
dmwolf View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 22 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dmwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 26 2011 at 6:33pm
Diane, I meant to respond also.   Having positive nodes after chemo is unfortunately a big risk factor for recurrence among TNs, so it probably makes sense to at least get other opinions and check out the trials for this situation.  We are on the vanguard of treatment, having had neoadjuvant chemo.  Studies are just starting up to answer questions on what to do with people like us, with residual disease after treatment.  Since you already had an anthracycline and a taxane, if you do decide to tack on some more treatment, you might want to do a platinum drug.  Since you are BRCA2+, the ideal would be carboplatin with one of the specific PARP inhibitors, like ABT-888 or Olaparib (not BSI-201).    It sucks to think about having more treatment, I know, but it could make the difference to do it now.

BUT, we should emphasize that (as far as I know) there is no good data out there backing up doing more chemo after neoadjuvant treatment.  The studies simply haven't been done.   Which of course means that there is no right or wrong answer, only guesses.   You can make a case for not doing any additional chemo as well.  

I don't envy you the decision.  Good luck gathering more information and mulling all this over.

d
DX 2/08@43 stg II IDC; gr2,0 nodes. Neoadj chemo, first ACx2 (fail) then CarboTaxotereX6(better). Lump, Rads done 11/08; Clodronate. False alarm queen: PetCT lung & TM marker. NED. PBM w/recon 9/10.
Back to Top
123Donna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 24 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Status: Offline
Points: 13510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 123Donna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 26 2011 at 8:51pm
Denise,

Do you know if there are any studies out there supporting doing additional chemo if you are NED?  Even though I'm currently NED and just finished radiation, I've asked 2 oncs about doing additional chemo to help prevent a recurrence.  Both of them said there is no justification for giving additional chemo if you are NED.  I just worry about any isolated or circulating cells.

Donna
DX IDC TNBC 6/09 age 49, Stage 1,Grade 3, 1.5cm,0/5Nodes,KI-67 48%,BRCA-,6/09bi-mx, recon, T/C X4(9/09)
11/10 Recur IM node, Gem,Carb,Iniparib 12/10,MRI NED 2/11,IMRT Radsx40,CT NED11/13,MRI NED3/15

Back to Top
mainsailset View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jul 27 2008
Location: Washington State
Status: Offline
Points: 5004
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mainsailset Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 26 2011 at 11:54pm
Donna, I'll ask Connie as she had mentioned this sometime ago and my feeble brain seems to remember someone here last winter talking about it.
dx 7/08 TN 14x6.5x5.5 cm tumor

3 Lymph nodes involved, Taxol/Sunitab+AC, 5/09 dbl masectomy, path 2mm tumor removed, lymphs all clear, RAD 32 finished 9/11/09. 9/28 CT clear 10/18/10 CT clear
Back to Top
DianeEE View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Nov 29 2010
Location: Richland, MI
Status: Offline
Points: 105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DianeEE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 2:51pm

Thanks everyone for your responses.  It has been so helpful.  I am investigating the clinical trial that was mentioned here--it is labeled "NCT01074970, BRE09-146, PARP Inhibition for Triple Negative Breast Cancer (ER-/PR-/HER2-)With BRCA1/2 Mutations" on the clincialtrials.gov website.  It appears as though I qualify and it might be a good way to get another round of more chemo.   I am about 1.5 hours from South Bend, Indiana, one of the treatment locations. I haven't pursued a second opinion yet.  And, I might not if I decide to do this trial.  Although, I did post the question on the John Hopkins website.  They have a forum where you can ask their oncologists their opinions.  They stated that since I'm in the "curative paradigm" that there are no studies that show I would benefit from adding additional platinum drugs.  Of course, they have not examined my chart, but it is another opinion.

So, I'll keep you posted.  If I do decide to do this trial, I can't start until at least 2 weeks after I'm done with radiation.  My last radiation treatment is scheduled for August 12.

Again, thanks for the input.  I would've never investigated doing further treatment if I hadn't read this info.  I feel empowered by knowing that I might be able to do something else to prevent recurrence.
 
Diane

DX 11/2010 age 43,BRCA2+,6 rounds TAC,bx mast/ovary removal 5/2011,TNBC tumor 5.1 cm,02/14 nodes positive,37 rads,Cisplatin&PARP trial.Recurrence 2/2012,TN IBC,Abraxane didn't work, Ixempra & Xeloda
Back to Top
tania View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 16 2011
Location: sf bay area
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tania Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 5:41pm
And there are no studies that show you wouldn't benefit from additional Platinum drugs.... 
 
So glad you were able to look into the trial and can make an informed choice about this.  Good luck and let us know!
DX 10/2010. 1.5cm, no nodes, grade 2. BRCA1+
Neoadjuvant chemo gem/carb/parpi trial.
Bilateral mastectomy 4/2011
Adjuvant chemo 4X TC - 5/11 - 7/11
Back to Top
DianeEE View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Nov 29 2010
Location: Richland, MI
Status: Offline
Points: 105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DianeEE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 6:28pm
Exactly right, Tania.  It's frustruating that they don't seem to know what to do with people like me (and others like me).  So, I think that the best bet might be the trial.  I have an appointment to talk to my oncologist about all of this on the 17th.  Will keep you posted on any new info.
 
Thanks again for all of your support, everyone!
Diane
DX 11/2010 age 43,BRCA2+,6 rounds TAC,bx mast/ovary removal 5/2011,TNBC tumor 5.1 cm,02/14 nodes positive,37 rads,Cisplatin&PARP trial.Recurrence 2/2012,TN IBC,Abraxane didn't work, Ixempra & Xeloda
Back to Top
dmwolf View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 22 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dmwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 7:37pm
Good luck, Diane.  Please let us know what advice you get and so forth.  This is new territory for all of us.
love,
d
DX 2/08@43 stg II IDC; gr2,0 nodes. Neoadj chemo, first ACx2 (fail) then CarboTaxotereX6(better). Lump, Rads done 11/08; Clodronate. False alarm queen: PetCT lung & TM marker. NED. PBM w/recon 9/10.
Back to Top
KarenC View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: Jul 07 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KarenC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 10:34pm
Hello all,

I also participated in the PARP inhibitor/cisplatin/Gemzar Phase 11 trial recently at Stanford and asked to stop one cycle early because my nodes were not shrinking at all. I am still angry that the doctor would have had me continue when clearly there was no indication of response. The reports I read about PARP inhibitors is that they failed to meet expectations in the phase 111 trials.

I am BRACA neg. I had double mastectomy two days ago ( removing the healthy breast was my choice)  came home yesterday. Feel good and can walk both arms above my shoulder but of course it hurts some. The surgeon said to start immediately to keep muscles loose and before discharging me he gently raised my left arm above my head and said I could not injure the surgical site by raising the arm that high.  The left arm has the positive nodes, and I will get the path report tomorrow, perhaps, when I get the dressings changed.  The surgeon originally told me he would just remove "level 2" nodes, but said after looking at my hard axillary nodes in the OR he went to level 3- took a supraclavicular node. He said I have a "bad cancer" and will have a long road ahead of me of radiation and more chemo, although my onc. said maybe I was just resistant to chemo and there is no research supporting giving more chemo after neoadjuvant chemo, surgery and radiation . She will see me again when the path report comes in and I am afraid she will say there is nothing more she can do after radiation. She is Stanford trained and has been practicing a few years, so of course I feel she has reasons backing this statement about no research, but i see that many of you have had chemo twice. Has anyone had cisplatin/gemzar first and different chemo when that did not work? What was the chemo?

Also- has anyone out there had one or more positive supraclavular nodes? I am assuming that indicates some metastasis. What chemo were you given?  I think it is time for a second opinion at UCSF. Thank you all for being there. No one in my family knows just how serious things are for me ( mother is 90 and kids are teens)  and I appreciate being able to be totally honest here and in my support groups.

Thanks, Karen
Back to Top
dmwolf View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 22 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dmwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 11:08pm
Hi, Karen.  I'm sorry you are dealing with a failed chemo.  It just sucks when we have that information, but like Diane and others have said, it does give us an opportunity to consider doing more.  You haven't had the standard of care yet, right?  (no AC and Taxol ?)   Just because the cancer wasn't sensitive to platinum's w/gemzar doesn't mean it won't be sensitive to either Adriamycin and/or Taxane.    In your shoes I would do the standard of care now, weekly Taxol for 12 weeks followed by dose dense AC for four cycles, every two weeks.   This should give you the best possible odds of getting out of this mess without recurring later.    

We are with you, Karen. You can count on us.

love,
d

DX 2/08@43 stg II IDC; gr2,0 nodes. Neoadj chemo, first ACx2 (fail) then CarboTaxotereX6(better). Lump, Rads done 11/08; Clodronate. False alarm queen: PetCT lung & TM marker. NED. PBM w/recon 9/10.
Back to Top
KarenC View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: Jul 07 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 81
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KarenC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 11:22pm
Thanks D,
I am certainly open to more chemo-anything! I have my wig at the ready.  Would the standard of care chemo start now or after radiation ?
Back to Top
123Donna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 24 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Status: Offline
Points: 13510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 123Donna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 11:26pm
KarenC,

I'm so sorry the chemo didn't work on the nodes.   The supraclavicular nodes are part of the Regional Lymph Nodes.  http://www.breastcancer.org/illustrations/i0056.html  
Please read the article Mainy posted in this thread:
http://forum.tnbcfoundation.org/radiation-rni_topic8602.html?KW=RNI
When you talk to your Radiation Oncologist before radiation ask them about whole breast radiation (WBI) and regional node radiation (RNI).  You may get this treatment with having a positive supraclavicular node.  I had it spread to a internal mammary node.  I met with 3 radiation oncologists before treatment and all 3 recommended WBI and RNI.  They said if you only hit one regional node area that you tend to end up chasing the nodes with recurrences.  So the theory is you hit them all at once. 

I was in the Iniparib/Carbo/Gemzar trial and is seemed to work on the node.  I think the idea of you getting a second or even a third opinion is a great idea.  I don't know why they wouldn't do chemo after the surgery or radiation.  For women that do not get neoadjuvant therapy, we usually always get chemo after surgery.  So if your tumor did not shrink at all then how is that different from those of us who didn't have chemo first?  We get adjuvant chemo to hopefully mop up any remaining cancer cells. 

These are just my opinions and I hope nothing I've said will upset you.  I just think TNBC doesn't play by the rules and we have to treat it aggressively.

So glad your recovery from the mastectomy is going well.   I couldn't lift my arm that high right afterwards.  I hope the rest of the recovery goes smoothly.

Donna

DX IDC TNBC 6/09 age 49, Stage 1,Grade 3, 1.5cm,0/5Nodes,KI-67 48%,BRCA-,6/09bi-mx, recon, T/C X4(9/09)
11/10 Recur IM node, Gem,Carb,Iniparib 12/10,MRI NED 2/11,IMRT Radsx40,CT NED11/13,MRI NED3/15

Back to Top
dmwolf View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jan 22 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dmwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 28 2011 at 11:33pm
Good question - I don't know whether it's better to have chemo before or after radiation.  My inclination would probably be to have the chemo first, then irradiate later.  That way, your treatment would be more like what most people get, just with an extra dollop of chemo in the very beginning before surgery.  Donna's advice on radiation is good.  I'd probably do the T/AC and then follow that with the radiation protocol she had.   It's a long haul, but worth it if it is just one crummy year out of a long beautiful life.

Good night everyone,

d

DX 2/08@43 stg II IDC; gr2,0 nodes. Neoadj chemo, first ACx2 (fail) then CarboTaxotereX6(better). Lump, Rads done 11/08; Clodronate. False alarm queen: PetCT lung & TM marker. NED. PBM w/recon 9/10.
Back to Top
MsBliss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Apr 25 2009
Location: Lost Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 722
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MsBliss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 29 2011 at 12:31am
Dear Donna,
Since additional chemo is not recommended for you, maybe you can do some elective things that are pretty potent.  Are you still following a supplement and life style protocol?  Us tnbc girls get uber benefits from sulforaphanes, curcumin, D3, green tea, and the rest of the Edge CAM goodies.....oops, posted before I was finished....and don't forget the blueberries!  Yum.
Many hugs,
Bliss


Edited by MsBliss - Jul 29 2011 at 1:35am
Back to Top
tania View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 16 2011
Location: sf bay area
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tania Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Jul 29 2011 at 2:04am
Hi Karen - I participted in and know quite a number of women from the Stanford trial.  Any adjuvant chemo has always been recommended before radiation. I am surprised that any of the docs there would have kept you on the protocol if there was no indication it was working.
 
Taxol followed by AC is probably the most aggressive, although my Stanford doctor has shown me some research that suggests Taxotere/cytoxan is as if not more effective with less harsh potential side effects/toxicity.  Although I did have a good response to the trial I opted for 4x TC. 
 
Try and see Hope Rugo at UCSF.  She is very familiar with the trial and has a number of us that consult with her while being treated at Stanford.
 
I will send you a PM and we can talk and I can put you in touch with others in the trial whose situation is most similar to yours, if that would be helpful.
 
Hoping you will get good news with the pathology report.
DX 10/2010. 1.5cm, no nodes, grade 2. BRCA1+
Neoadjuvant chemo gem/carb/parpi trial.
Bilateral mastectomy 4/2011
Adjuvant chemo 4X TC - 5/11 - 7/11
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.