New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - No chemo
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

No chemo

 Post Reply Post Reply
smrdmnd View Drop Down

Joined: Aug 17 2020
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote smrdmnd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: No chemo
    Posted: Aug 17 2020 at 7:02pm
Does anyone know the statistics if you don't do chemo and only do radiation?  I am 70 year old and found out I have tnbc and I have stage 2.  Concerned about my other health issues especially me having a pacemaker.  Thanks.
Back to Top
SagePatientAdvocates View Drop Down
Senior Advisor
Senior Advisor

Joined: Apr 15 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4656
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SagePatientAdvocates Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Aug 18 2020 at 12:38am
Dear smrdmnd,

I have come to the conclusion, after being a Patient Advocate for the last 15 years that
your question is almost impossible to answer. Don't get me wrong, it is an important, great question. It is just that everyone is different and what works for one person, often doesn't work for another.

You need a good Breast Medical Oncologist and a good Breast Radiation Oncologist to sit
down with you and try to explain the pros and cons and then keep your fingers crossed that you pick the right one.

I have helped several young women in their 30's like my daughter was, and they had almost identical presentations when first diagnosed with TNBC and half of them had great results and half did not. They all had the same treatment. Why the difference? In 2004 we did not know about molecular testing...Maybe that was it?...They all had TNBC and all were BRCA1 positive, but different alleles...Maybe that was it? So many women with TNBC, including my daughter, have told me how they hated Taxol, and others have told me of the tough times the had with AC. And some women go flying through chemo and others like my daughter suffered through it. And some found XRT to be awful and some did fine. And some hated both ACT and XRT and others did fine.

It seems we all have our own particular set of experiences..

There would have to be a randomized trial with women who have your particular set of circumstances and 1/2 would get chemo and 1/2 radiation therapy. Don't think that trial would accrue very easily.

Sorry, I can't be more helpful. Please try to find the professionals I mentioned above and see what they say. You may have to get second or even third opinions. As the statisticians say the n is important and we all are a n of 1. Even if there was a trial like I suggested and the odds were in favor of chemo, despite your personal issues, it still might not be the best thing for you. Again, sorry to be so unhelpful.  

One more thought..there is a fairly new profession out there called cardio-oncology so maybe add that professional to the list above and between the three of them you can make as knowledgeable a decision as possible. I have seen a lot of TNBC women with heart issues over the years. It's a difficult problem.

with my love to all here,


I am a BRCA1+ grandson, son and father of women affected by breast/oc-my daughter inherited mutation from me, and at 36, was dx 2004 TNBC I am a volunteer patient advocate with SAGE Patient Advocates
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.