New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Adding Radiation to Regional Nodes for Early BC?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Adding Radiation to Regional Nodes for Early BC?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
123Donna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 24 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Status: Offline
Points: 13285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 123Donna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Adding Radiation to Regional Nodes for Early BC?
    Posted: Oct 01 2013 at 1:00pm
More Radiation Ups Overall Survival in Early Breast Cancer

AMSTERDAM -- Women with early breast cancer had better survival when they received radiation therapy to the internal mammary and supraclavicular lymph nodes, long-term follow-up in a European trial showed.

The 10-year overall survival was 82.3% with nodal irradiation and 80.7% without. The difference did not achieve statistical significance, in part, because survival exceeded expectations in the control group.

The 10-year disease-free and metastasis-free survival (DFS and MFS) both improved significantly with irradiation,Philip Poortmans, MD, of Institute Verbeeten in Tilburg, the Netherlands, reported here at the European Cancer Congress (ECC).

"Our results make it clear that irradiating these lymph nodes gives a better patient outcome than giving radiation therapy to the breast and thoracic wall only," Poortmans said. "Not only have we shown that such treatment has a beneficial effect on locoregional disease control, but it also improves distant MFS and overall survival."

The findings came down on the side of benefit for a question that had remained unanswered for years. Previous studies had shown that axillary lymph node irradiation improves survival in early breast cancer. After axillary nodes, secondary pathways of lymphatic drainage included the internal-mammary and supraclavicular lymph nodes, which might provide an escape route for microscopic cancer cells.

Because of the good results obtained with axillary irradiation and concerns about added radiotherapy-related toxicity, many oncologists have opted not to treat the internal-mammary and supraclavicular nodes with radiation therapy, Poortmans said. As a result, the possible benefits of irradiating the secondary drainage pathway remained unclear.

To examine the efficacy and safety of the additional radiotherapy, investigators at 43 centers in Europe enrolled 4,004 patients with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer. Three-fourths of the patients had breast-conserving surgery, and 85% of those had a radiation boost to the primary tumor bed. Among patients who underwent mastectomy, 73% received chest-wall irradiation.

The patients were randomized to expanded radiotherapy that included the internal-mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph nodes or to standard radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the trial was statistically powered to detect an improvement in 10-year OS from 75% to 79% with the additional radiation therapy.

After a median follow-up of 10.9 years, the results favored irradiation of the secondary lymphatic pathway for all survival endpoints:

  • OS: 82.3% versus 80.7% (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1.00, P=0.056)
  • DFS: 72.1% versus 69.1% (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.00, P=0.044)
  • MFS: 78% versus 75% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98, P=0.020)

The treatment effect on OS was unaffected by number of involved lymph nodes (P>0.1 for heterogeneity):

  • Node-negative patients: HR 0.79
  • One to three involved nodes: HR 0.89
  • Four to nine positive nodes: HR 0.85
  • ≥10 positive lymph nodes: HR 1.00

Disease stage at diagnosis also did not influence the effect of internal mammary/supraclavicular irradiation.

"We believe that this is likely to be related to the positive interaction of the [radiation] treatment with systemic treatment -- chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy," Poortmans said.

Poortmans reported 382 deaths in the experimental arm and 411 in the group that received conventional radiotherapy. Causes of death did not differ with exception of breast cancer: 259 in the experimental arm versus 310 in the control arm.

An earlier report from the trial investigators addressed the issue of toxicity, showing that the additional exposure to radiation therapy did not increase adverse events during follow-up to 3 years.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ECC/41939



Edited by 123Donna - Oct 02 2013 at 11:13am
DX IDC TNBC 6/09 age 49, Stage 1,Grade 3, 1.5cm,0/5Nodes,KI-67 48%,BRCA-,6/09bi-mx, recon, T/C X4(9/09)
11/10 Recur IM node, Gem,Carb,Iniparib 12/10,MRI NED 2/11,IMRT Radsx40,CT NED11/13,MRI NED3/15

Back to Top
123Donna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Aug 24 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Status: Offline
Points: 13285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 123Donna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: Oct 02 2013 at 11:15am
Improved survival in breast cancer through early treatment of chest lymph nodes

Giving radiation therapy to the lymph nodes located behind the breast bone and above the collar bone to patients with early breast cancer improves overall survival without increasing side effects. This new finding ends the uncertainty about whether the beneficial effect of radiation therapy in such patients was simply the result of irradiation of the breast area, or whether it treatedcancer cells in the local lymph nodes as well, the 2013 European Cancer Congress (ECC2013) [1] heard.

Dr Philip Poortmans, a radiation oncologist from the Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands, and a member of the EORTC Radiation Oncology and Breast Cancer Groups, said that results from the international randomised trial, which involved 4004 patients from 43 centres, were convincing. "Our results make it clear that irradiating these lymph nodes give a better patient outcome than giving radiation therapy to the breast/thoracic wall alone. Not only have we shown that such treatment has a beneficial effect on locoregional disease control, but it also improves distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival," he told an ECC2013 news briefing on Friday.

Lymphatic drainage from breast cancer means that the cancer is more likely to spread to other parts of the body. It normally follows two pathways. The best known is to the axilla (armpit), and these lymph nodes are usually treated by surgery and/or radiation therapy. The second pathway drains to the internal mammary (IM) lymph nodes behind the breast bone, and also to those just above the collar bone, the medial supraclavicular (MS) nodes. Because of uncertainty about the effects of treatment in this area, and particularly concerns about the increased toxicity that might be due to the irradiation of a larger area, many centres do not currently treat the IM-MS lymph nodes.

After an average follow-up of 10.9 years, the researchers found that patients in the IM-MS treatment group had better overall survival independent of the number of lymph nodes involved. A total of 382 patients in the IM-MS group died during that period, compared with 429 in the non IM-MS group, and there was no increase in non-breast cancer related mortality in the first group. To date, there have been no serious complications related to the treatment.

The researchers believe that the beneficial effect of IM-MS radiation can be explained by the ability of the treatment to eradicate microscopic tumour deposits in the lymph nodes. "With this treatment, we can stop the development of metastases at their source," said Dr Poortmans. "Interestingly, this effect is irrespective of the stage of the tumour. We believe that this is likely to be related to the positive interaction of the IM-MS treatment with systemic treatment --chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted treatment."

Patients at low risk of their cancer spreading outside the breast will often be given less intensive systemic therapy in order to spare them side effects. In these cases, using IM-MS radiation therapy can improve their outcome by eradicating residual tumour cells in the breast/thoracic wall. For patients at high risk of metastases, who receive systemic therapy, the prospect of cure is also related to the chance of leaving residual tumour cells behind throughout the body. In these cases too, the ultimate outcome can be improved by using effective locoregional treatment to eradicate disease at the site where it is most likely to be present, the researchers say.

"The results of our trial, in which the patients received appropriate systemic treatments, contradict the existence of a 'competition' between locoregional and systemic treatments," said Dr Poortmans. "Because there is an interaction between these treatments, in many patients their combination will result in an enhancement of the combined benefits; in other words, one plus one can equal more than two."

The researchers intend to follow up these patients in the long term and are planning an average follow-up of 20 years, with the next analysis at 15 years.

"It is of the utmost importance that we record all possible events, including recurrence and toxicity, and such follow-up will also give us the opportunity to continue evaluating our patients in other areas, for example quality of life and wellbeing," said Dr Poortmans. "But we believe that our trial has already given solid evidence of the benefits of radiation treatment of the IM-MS lymph nodes, and we hope that such treatment will become standard clinical practice for patients with early breast cancer."

Professor Cornelis van de Velde, President of ECCO, said: "In past studies, radiotherapy as an adjunct to surgery has shown important improvements in locoregional control as well as survival, and these further survival benefits without an increase in short and long-term toxicities are a valuable development. The results of this study will help us on the road to the development of yet more personalised treatments, in which we have to find the delicate balance between under-treatment resulting in an increased risk of disease recurrence, and over-treatment accompanied by unnecessary toxicity, in order to provide optimal care for breast cancer patients."

DX IDC TNBC 6/09 age 49, Stage 1,Grade 3, 1.5cm,0/5Nodes,KI-67 48%,BRCA-,6/09bi-mx, recon, T/C X4(9/09)
11/10 Recur IM node, Gem,Carb,Iniparib 12/10,MRI NED 2/11,IMRT Radsx40,CT NED11/13,MRI NED3/15

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.